Speaking of Spidey 3, someone has edited out the crap in the film to create the perfect cut... which ends up being about 5 seconds. Not a frame is wasted, and it says everything that the actual movie did in two hours. And still leaves a horrible taste of failure in your mouth. (Via /Film and Great White Snark)
Comments
darthbogus said:
I love Mysetrio but I don't know how he would work on film. I guess we will see.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 12:19:53 PM
plaidstallions said:
The news of Bruce got me excited, then the clip of Petey dancing made me sad inside. Bravo!
Posted 09/14/2009 at 12:29:30 PM
EVula said:
I really have to disagree with you; the five-second clip didn't leave nearly as bad an aftertaste in my mouth.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 12:41:48 PM
Rann said:
I can't decide if Bruce Campbell would be better as Mysterio or Kraven the Hunter.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 01:14:25 PM
tredlow said:
You guys know that there's a whole series of "5 second movies" right? You can find the official ones at http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/5-second-movies
Posted 09/14/2009 at 01:27:22 PM
innercityrobot said:
No bad aftertaste here. Mostly because Peter dancing is SO absurd that it was the only part of the movie I liked. Seriously, it's the only part of the movie anyone, filmmakers and cast, seem to be actually enjoying themselves while making that flick (seems they all knew it was going to be crap).
And yup, Kraven and Mysterio would be good roles for Bruce.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 01:35:17 PM
Chad said:
Little harsh on Spiderman 3, aren't you? The only 2 bad pieces in that movie were Emo pimp-slapping dancing Peter Parker and the atrocity that was every single frame that had anything to do with Venom (not the black spidey suit).
I enjoyed Franco's screen escapades, especially his pie sceen, lol. I also was pleasantly blown away by Grace's performance. Every single second of Sandman was glorious.
If Raimi could go back and do it all over again, I'd be satisfied with the only changes being: A) Venom is not in this movie, whatsoever, and B) Peter does not turn emo.
Then again, if Raimi could go back and do it all over, I'd beg and plead with him to not cast Tobey Mcguire or Kristin Dunst. While Kristin is great in roles that suit her, her Mary Jane is crappy (and very nipply). And Tobey Mcguire just shouldn't get work ever again, period. He may have Gary Sinise's eyes, but he has none of his talent.
Actually, now that I think about it, I'm only defending Spiderman 3, because it wasn't that bad when compared to the other 2 Spidey flicks. Looking at the series as a whole, it wasn't so good. I'm ready for a reboot on tthis series.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 02:35:15 PM
Chad said:
And when are we going to get the damn Lizard in this series? Connors has been established in the movie universe, so make him a monster already. And get Shocker in here. He's one of the few Spidey villians I have always thought was cool, despite how eternally minor he is.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 02:37:56 PM
PossibleMisnomer said:
That movie needs to be re-edited with the kid yelling "WHOSE RESPONSIBLE THIS".
Posted 09/14/2009 at 03:43:10 PM
innercityrobot said:
Chad, you're crazy. Spider-Man 2 was a legitimately good movie. That's why everyone shits on Spider-Man 3, because it joins X-Men 3 in how badly it dropped the ball.
Posted 09/14/2009 at 05:26:29 PM
JB said:
People are a bit too hard on spiderman 3, its sorta like GI Joe if a few things were different it would be awesome
Posted 09/14/2009 at 06:04:22 PM
Carl said:
Anyone else notice that the "5 second" summary was actually 10 seconds?
Posted 09/14/2009 at 06:14:06 PM
wingdarkness said:
It's hilarious but the only part of that soul-sucking movie that I honestly enjoyed was emo-Peter...I never liked Kristen Dunce as Mary jane (since she's a white-trash slutty looking version and has nothing in common with the comicbook character IMO), so to see emo-Pete trash her was a treat for me^^...As for the rest though, yeah S3, it sucked HARD! I'm a fan of Topher Grace TOO, but god help me if they bring him back as venom...VENOM IS NOT A SARCASTIC DRYWIT VILLIAN SONY!!!
Posted 09/14/2009 at 06:22:13 PM
Anonymous said:
Originally the Shocker was going to appear briefly in the opening to Spider-Man 3 but was cut out because of time. And screw Mysterio, bring on the Sinister Six!
Posted 09/15/2009 at 06:47:20 AM
GQ said:
Mysterio is a ridiculous villian but Campbell could make him so chessy it'd actually work.
And Spider-Man 3 was shockingly dreadful.
Posted 09/15/2009 at 06:53:24 AM
Jeff W. said:
I was already to laugh but that was, well, stupid.
Posted 09/15/2009 at 07:38:12 AM
Anonymous said:
I prefer the How It Should Have Ended version of Spider-Man 3; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoNgMVFQNBI
Posted 09/15/2009 at 10:59:27 AM






