...huh. DC's calling this a very big announcement, but I admit I'm a bit confused. Is this finally DC's version of Marvel's "Ultimate" universe? I guess it is, since it's both a brand-new continuity but both titles are set on Earth One and can theoretically crossover. If so, I think it's pretty telling that Wonder Woman isn't joining Bats and Supers on this little endeavor, since her character is so screwed up no one knows what to do with her even if you start from scratch.Starting next year, DC Comics will unveil SUPERMAN: EARTH ONE and BATMAN: EARTH ONE, two graphic novels spotlighting the most powerful heroes of the DC Universe, with their first years and earliest moments retold in a standalone, original graphic novel format, on a new earth with an all-new continuity.
Return to Smallville and experience the journey of Earth's greatest adopted son, as he grows from boy to Superman in SUPERMAN: EARTH ONE by J. Michael Straczynski and artist Shane Davis.
Watch from the darkest corners of Crime Alley as a young boy is struck by unbelievable tragedy that will forge the greatest crime-fighter to ever stalk the rooftops of Gotham City in BATMAN: EARTH ONE, by writer Geoff Johns and artist Gary Frank.
But wasn't DC's All-Star Comics supposed to be DC's answer to Ultimate Marvel? I'd say Grant Morrison's All-Star Superman is the definitive Superman comic, and worth handing to anyone who doesn't understand how Superman can be awesome (including me until I read it); sure, Frank Miller's Batman was the least definitive take on Batman possibly ever, although it was hilariously entertaining. Sure, All-Star was different from Ultimate, but it worked -- and I'd have been interested in reading more of 'em. But will DC let Stracynski and Johns play around enough with their two beloved characters enough to make Earth One more than just another retelling of their origins stories?
Comments
JOE said:
This is so stupid.
They expect us to get all hot and bothered over something like killing Batman while in the meantime, they'll have two or three alternate titles is which he's doing just fine. This is why I have such a hard time keeping an interest in comics.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:08:24 PM
You do know that they showed that Batman was alive about ten pages after he supposedly "died", right? Were you just reading those batshit insane UK press articles where they screwed up the story about fifteen different ways?
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:20:57 PM
JOE replied to Geoff:
No I didn't even read it. That's what I mean. They hyped it all up just like they are hyping up the death of Ironhide in Transformers but it's not like these characters are gonna disappear. In a year or so, the whole thing just gets rebooted or retold again and again again.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:36:35 PM
The point is that no one expected you to get hot and bothered about it. The only people who bought into the hype were people who thought, to quote Chris Sims, that Batman was going to die in a story whose first line of dialogue was "BATMAN AND ROBIN WILL NEVER DIE!"
The only people hyping it up were people who were jumping to conclusions.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:41:05 PM
Jeff W. said:
I don't think I ever need to read another take on Superman's or Batman's origin ever again for the rest of my life. Big sigh.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:09:32 PM
I hear that, brother. Enough with these two and their origins already! At this point in time, even pre-school aged kids can tell you that Superman is from a planet that blew up and Batmans parents were killed when he was a kid.
Enough!
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:34:51 PM
emerson999 replied to Jeff W.:
Same. You'd have to do something really crazy with it at this point for me to be interested. Along the line of red son. Otherwise, I've seen superman and batman's start far too many times to care again.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 07:18:32 PM
Bill replied to emerson999:
Thing is, I don't think these books are aimed at people like us who have read multiple versions of Batman and Superman's origins. These books are intended to be ways to bring in new readers.
The DC Universe has a lot of baggage behind it, and it's pretty daunting for a new reader to dive right in.
Creating a new universe with recognizable characters but with a clean slate makes it easier for newbies to start reading comics.
Let's face it- if DC and Marvel want to prosper, they need new readers, and "Blackest Night", "Invasion", etc. are not going to do it.
Whether this actually works, though, is up to debate. My guess is that things will start getting pretty messy pretty quickly.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 07:49:07 AM
Geoff said:
I think that All-Star got quickly repurposed as sort of a creator-driven alternative to the mainstream universe, which is why Adam Hughes' oft-rumoured All-Star WW never came about - it was probably too "straight" a take on the format.
I don't know if I like either of the writer choices on this one; JMS already pretty much took his pass on the Superman origin in Supreme Power, while Johns... well, I've always hated his take on Batman, although part of that is because he was writing Mary Sue Jordan as his lead most of those times.
Also... isn't Johns already re-doing Superman's origin? Why the hell do we need another version? If these were positioned strictly for Barnes and Noble and the like, I could see the reasoning behind them - as gateway books - but that doesn't sound like the intent.
Really odd choice. Can't believe I'm saying this about books with art by Shane Davis and Gary Frank, but I'll probably pass.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:11:44 PM
mrm1138 replied to Geoff:
Geoff wrote: "If these were positioned strictly for Barnes and Noble and the like, I could see the reasoning behind them - as gateway books - but that doesn't sound like the intent."
I would disagree with that assessment just because of the fact that they're releasing them as original graphic novels as opposed to single issues. Those are far more user-friendly (for lack of a better term) for new readers, and they're obviously much easier to find in a Barnes and Noble or Borders.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 08:49:44 PM
MattK said:
Stracynzki, huh? So we can expect that Superman is part of some kind of totem god thing and will later gain all new powers after hibernating, only to have it, his marriage, and the revelation of his identity all whisked away when he makes a deal with the devil (I guess Blue Devil?) to save Martha Kent?
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:17:26 PM
jestergoblin said:
If they keep it controlled, it could work. But then it would just be Smallville again pretty much.
I don't see what makes these special. And Earth One already exists, pre-crisis.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:24:41 PM
Wes Grogan said:
Oh, good lord. How many different origin stories has Superman had in the last ten years? Seriously? And they just get retconned over and over and over again. I honestly can't work up the least bit of interest anymore. Work up an origin that lasts more than ten years and I'll check it out then. Yeesh.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:27:50 PM
Scortia said:
I enjoy Johns' writing, so I will remain apprehensive but optimistic.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:49:26 PM
Sean T. Collins said:
Rob, the news here is at least as much about the format as it is about the content. "Ultimate DC" is interesting, but doing a pair of ongoing shared-universe superhero series starring the company's flagship characters in OGN format is really interesting.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 04:51:27 PM
Rob replied to Sean T. Collins:
You know, I'm so used to manga only coming out through GNs that I totally forgot that would be a big deal. Wave of the future, friends.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 06:01:28 PM
keepoffthegrass said:
This is why I DONT read comics anymore (Gasp!)
Earth One? I thought the "dead" batman was on earth one already? Why do you need to tell me a story about his origin when its been done to death!?
Why is there so many superman(men?) around? You got a regular supes, an older grey haired one from another earth...kingdom come supes (why!) and lets not even get started on all his cousins, sisters, refugees from krypton and animals that all have the same powers!
What makes Superman special is there is ONE. ONE guy who can close a volcano.
ONE guy who can freeze something with a whisper.
ONE guy who has the weight of responsibility of those powers. Just one fucking Superman. jeez!
Now we have yet another Batman and Superman? How long till these guys get folded into "regular" continuity?
How does DC expect to get new readers? Its insane....
sorry for ranting.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:00:53 PM
Geoff replied to keepoffthegrass:
"What makes Superman special is there is ONE. ONE guy who can close a volcano.
ONE guy who can freeze something with a whisper.
ONE guy who has the weight of responsibility of those powers. Just one fucking Superman. jeez!"
This is what happens when you have people who grew up on those insane silver age comics writing Superman. They view the Byrne origin as the root of all evil.
Give it another ten years and it'll be people who grew up watching the DCAU, so we'll be back to those versions.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:03:45 PM
keepoffthegrass replied to Geoff:
I guess, but that should just be a simple ret-con...why does Kingdom Come supes need to be there?
Thats what made KC so special. It was a "what-if", It was just a great stand-alone. Now we have to KNOW where red robin came from? Who cares?
If I can suspend my disbelief enough about Batman not getting older (alfred too), then I sure as shit can deal with the fact that sometimes Joe Chill kills his 'rents and sometimes its just some guy.
I honestly shouldnt have to have a score card or a dictionary to read comic books. Do I have to check wikipedia!?
Not only is there all the copy cat heroes running around. Youve got characters who were someone and now someone else. Batgirl and Red Robin for instance. How long did it take for someone to be permanent?
I guess im getting old.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:13:19 PM
Geoff replied to keepoffthegrass:
Well, KC Supes is gone away - Johns used him for one (incredibly long, drawn-out) story and then put him back in the box. That type of thing I don't really mind.
"Not only is there all the copy cat heroes running around. Youve got characters who were someone and now someone else. Batgirl and Red Robin for instance. How long did it take for someone to be permanent?"
Your complaint should be put into a time machine and directed to Julius Schwartz, circa 1956, because that's when DC started creating new heroes with the same names as classic versions. If you've read a comic since then, you don't have much to complain about, since it's been present for as long as anyone likely to read this has been alive (and extends to Marvel as well - look at the Human Torch).
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:29:41 PM
keepoffthegrass replied to Geoff:
I guess your right I really forgot that the whole silver age are heroes with same name/new ID. The Flash is more like a legacy then one man.
But I guess my real beef is the quick turn around. Right when your accepting the character, its wiped away.
like I said I dont read comics anymore.I stopped after Jason Todd returned and I simply cant understand them.
I feel like I need a flowchart.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 08:46:20 AM
SuperDevil replied to Geoff:
There was only "ONE" Superman in the Silver Age, towards the end, Superman would meet the older, Earth-2 a few times, but it was rare.
You're thinking of the Bronze Age, when they brought back the JSA in their own title and the Golden Age Superman was showing up more frequently.
And, Bryne's reboot sucked. A good idea that became a gigantic mistake that ultimately did more damage then anything else. For example, it killed off the very popular Legion of Superheroes titles (which was a hit for over a decade). The animated series tried it's best to ignore it, the JL cartoon especially ignored it (because it started referring to Supergirl as Superman's cousin), and Smallville ignored it.
Krypton as a cold, heartless planet? Never used outside of comics and has been out of continuity for a decade now.
Pa Kent still being alive when Clark becomes Superman? A mind-boggling stupid thing, since it's his father's death that teaches Clark humility and his own limitations. Complately ignored in Smallville.
People keep referring back to this event as something special and yet the best Superman comics/appearances in the last 25 years states otherwise (All-Star Superman, Kingdom Come, New Frontier, etc.).
Posted 12/08/2009 at 02:26:08 AM
Geoff replied to SuperDevil:
The animated series ignored it? He still wasn't Superboy, Lex Luthor was still the infinitely preferable Byrne version - a thought reinforced by the BRILLIANT 'power suit' bit in the JLU finale - Lois was the hard-nosed military brat, etc. More than anything else, Byrne emphasized that Clark Kent is the real personality, which has been the dominant point of Superman in the last 20 years and deservedly so. Also, he got away from the 'Clark Kent, spineless wimp' characterisation, which was an anchor on the character.
I don't really care about Krypton being interpreted a different way because, well, it's whole purpose is to blow the hell up. It's like people complaining about the characterisation of Thomas Wayne or Ben Parker.
And the LSH being sacrificed might have been a big deal when it was only one of two or three DC books that sold in numbers, but that wasn't the case by the time 1986 rolled around. By then, sales had already started to slip after Titans took over as DC's marquee team book, and that position was then handed over to the Justice League, meaning the world was once again as it should be.
Besides, sacrificing the LSH in the name of making Superman a better character is a net gain in my books. Too bad Johns thinks otherwise.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 02:47:41 PM
Nicnac said:
They have no new stories to tell. So, Batman Begins, Superman Begins, are looking to be the norm for every retread of these franchises...
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:01:29 PM
Captain Flunky said:
Daniel Craig + Jersey Shore guido + dash of Twilight vampire = 'Adult Bruce Wayne' sketch
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:29:50 PM
Eye-Roller Lass said:
As long as emo-looking Bruce doesn't sparkle in the sun, I'm cool.
JMS writing 'Supes is a bit unsettling, though.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:31:42 PM
Monkey said:
Ohhhh! An origins story! We need more origin stories! You know what? Lets go ahead and redo Green Lantern too, I want to see how he his ring.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:36:59 PM
longbowhunter said:
This could be exciting...if it works. A few years ago this would have pissed me off something fierce,but Superboy-Prime pretty much punched the crap out of my love of the DC Universe proper. Like an abused housewife I keep wandering back,only to be hurt again and again. The key to this will be having editors who actually ride herd on the creators(which is where the All-Star line went wrong) and having the balls to make things different. The Ultiate Marvel 'verse was great when it was all fresh and new,but after a few years they just started re-treading stories from the 616 universe.
I would love to see a version of the Riddler that was more along the lines of Jigsaw...and the scary,psycho Joker has been done to death so why not give us a funny,charming Ceaser Romero version....who turns into Pennywise when we least expect it. Years ago I believe Wizard magazine had a piece with their version of the Ultimate DC Universe and they had a drawing of Commissioner Gordon who looked like Morgan Freemans charatcer from SEVEN...do some shit like that and mix it up a bit and I'll be there with bells on....as long as they keep it from turning into the adventures of the Goddamn Batman!!!
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:37:48 PM
Geoff replied to longbowhunter:
"The key to this will be having editors who actually ride herd on the creators"
Unfortunately, that's in short supply at DC these days. They can't even correct typos most of the time these days; you'd NEVER see that in a book from their late-90s glory days. Whomever they've got editing the books now doesn't hold a candle to Carlin / Denny / etc., and they've chased away the only good editors they had like Waid and Wacker. I think their editors these days are just the office interns.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:41:01 PM
longbowhunter replied to Geoff:
Amen brother....Editors are one of those things you should never even notice if they're doing their job right. Ever since O'Neil left its been a downhill slide for the Bat-Books and the rest of the DC Universe it seems. The editors today are all too busy kissing celebrity ass and being chummy with the talent to actually...you know...EDIT the damn books and keep the writers on track.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 06:17:45 PM
Greymattersplat said:
I think there's a big point that a LOT of the websites, and particularly us the fans, are missing out on with this announcement. That point is that these books aren't necessarily "for" us. Sure, they want us to be able to pick them up, read them, and enjoy them...but that by itself isn't the ultimate goal. The goal is, that when your buddy, who has just watched The Dark Knight for the fifteenth time but has never read a comic book in his life, FINALLY asks you where a good place to start reading Batman would be, you've got a very definite, very specific starting point that you can hand him and say "here". Yes, it is its own shared continuity, and yes, it's basically "Ultimate DC", but how many new or lapsed fans came to Marvel when they launched their own shedding of continuity? And doing it in direct to TPb form is a really good idea. As much as I'm a proponent of floppies, this again isn't "for" me. It's for the guy who's new to comics, and might actually just sit down and read a whole story if he doesn't have to wait for the next part. Comics is shifting towards trades anyway, and this puts them ahead of the curve, if you ask me. I would also not be surprised AT ALL if they were to turn around and serialize the GNs as digital content. That way the people that want the floppies have that option, but it's not going to cost them extra production plus it tests those particular waters. I know we all think of these as "our" characters, but it is time we shared them with more of the world, and this feels like a really good way to actually do that. You can bet these won't be the end, either. Superman and Batman are the most well known, so they get to be first. But how dumb would it be for them not to do one of these for Green Lantern for them to release right before the new movie? Maybe with a Wonder Woman one to back it up? Next could maybe be Flash and Aquaman. After that? Who knows?! Maybe even a Justice League! Let's not forget that these could also be really spiffy platforms on which to hang their movies and tie some movie-type continuity together.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:40:11 PM
Geoff replied to Greymattersplat:
Agreed - if they were smart they'd just sell these to bookstores and ignore comic shops entirely.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:50:17 PM
keepoffthegrass replied to Greymattersplat:
Good point.
especially with batmans costume using the yellow and black logo. Non-comic fans recognize it as batman more then his current "yellow-less" symbol.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 08:52:13 AM
manobon replied to keepoffthegrass:
I Absolutely continue to follow both DC and Marvel, reg continuity and ultimate (elseworld's for DC), and this sounds pretty damn great to me. Graphic Novels insead of $4 monthly issues? Great! Especially since standalone issues are rare anyhow, annd -since I give a shit about the character- I want the "whole" story (TPB version) anyhow. "Ultimate DC"? Finally! They should've done this ever since there was that Wizard feature of imagined Ultimate DC characters (Batman looks pretty similar, though I don't believe he had an Ugly Ass Gray Onesie in the concept picture)- no Ultra goofy bullshit, just semi-goofy comic bullshit in "real world" settings. Superman:Birthright Returns. I can't wait for these to come out.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 04:16:36 PM
Brent said:
Heh heh ... Crime Alley. That always killed me.
Thomas: What a wonderful night at the theatre!
Martha: The car is SO far away, dear, is there no relief?
Thomas: Don't worry. I know a short cut. We'll go down CRIME ALLEY. What could possibly go wrong in CRIME ALLEY,
Thomas Wayne = the first winner of the Darwin Award.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:53:51 PM
Neuronin replied to Brent:
It wasn't called Crime Alley until the Waynes got killed there. Before then it was just "Park Row". I figure that after Mommy and Daddy Wayne got kacked there, all sorts of scumbags started just shooting whoever came down the alley hoping they were Rothschilds or people wearing golden underpants or something.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 06:34:12 PM
John said:
The problem with these kinds of comics is two-fold:
1) Do we need ANOTHER re-telling of Superman's origin story? Is there really anyone who doesn't know how he came from Krypton, etc?
2) These may be "gateway" comics, but it won't last very long. Within a year, these versions of Superman and Batman will have stories just as convoluted as the "regular universe" versions.
I think publishers are doing fans a dis-service when they view 30 years (or even 10 years) of history as "baggage" or "obstacles for new readers".
Shouldn't the fun of comics include discovering that back issue where a character is introduced? Or has that fun been replaced by the speculation-market which drove the first appearance of Cable to $80, which makes impossible for the average reader to get the issue?
Plus, I thought DC's annual "Crisis" events were supposed to be a good "jumping on" point. Then again, if they have to do another "Crisis" event every-other-year, then what does that say about their ability to write easy-to-follow-stories?
Posted 12/07/2009 at 05:54:10 PM
Neuronin said:
Erg...it's ridiculous, I know, but Batman's costume looks TERRIBLE without the boxer shorts. He looks like a super-janitor, not a super-hero.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 06:35:43 PM
Greg said:
When pressed for comment DC Comics' editor-in-chief said "Seriously? I don't even know what fucking Earth our current continuity takes place on anymore..."
Posted 12/07/2009 at 06:55:46 PM
Gnomemaster said:
Poor, poor Wonder Woman, can't get a Wonder break. I say the path that needs to be taken with her is to really focus on magical side of her. If I were working for DC I'd pitch it like this. Superman protects Earth from sciency threats, Batman protects Gotham from his small army of enemies. Wonder Woman should protect Earth from Hades, Ares, and oh what the hell Dionysus (he wants to turn the oceans to wine!) I think really cranking up the Magical factor, she doesn't really worry about stopping crooks when the River Styx starts unloading it's bevvy of souls in her back yard. We could also throw in Wonder Women from other pantheons, imagine Vunder Frau from the Norse pantheon! or a Wonder Woman from India! The India one would be way more interesting than Vunder Frau but hey, it's just an idea.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 07:20:48 PM
demoncat said:
this shows dc is trying to milk their two biggest guns to dryness and it could be they are doing their version of marvel ulitmate line now. as for all star wonder woman dan Diedo said that adam wanted a few issues done and in the can before dc ever relises it. for wonder woman is still the same its donna troy aka wonder girl one who is so screwed up not even alan moore could fix her
Posted 12/07/2009 at 07:21:33 PM
Pandora's Homeobox said:
Cons: Retelling a story that everyone knows, ignoring characters who really need a fix-up, probably not going to attract new readers anyway
Pros: Young Bruce is really cute
. . . The Pros have it! As a nerd girl, I support this reboot.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 08:23:36 PM
Baltimoron said:
Quite frankly, a continuity reboot is exactly what the core DC titles need. Superhero books in general tend to be too weighed down by decades of twisted continuity and DC titles may be the worst of them on that front. None of DC's attempts to bring order to the universe have worked. This may just be what the doctor ordered.
My primary reservation is that they've given Batman to Geoff Johns. Greg Rucka would have been a much better choice. He's already proven his ability to write Bat titles better than just about anyone out there. Johns, on the other hand, is responsible for the abortion that is Blackest Night. DC probably chose Johns because his titles move. The problem is that they sell to fanboys and fanboys alone. Rucka writes comics in a way that can bring in new readers. Isn't that the point of this whole exercise?
As for Wonder Woman, my bet is that they'll give her an Earth One book if the Bat and the Boy Scout do well. Wonder Woman is a character with tons of potential. She's just tethered to a colossally convoluted backstory that has been tugged back and forth by some of the most turbulent years of Western gender relations and editorial's read on what sort of woman the market will buy. Diana needs a clean slate and I hope they give it to her with Earth One.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 08:33:37 PM
longbowhunter replied to Baltimoron:
I like Rucka a damn sight better as a novelist than a comics writer. That being said,if they were to turn him loose on a continuity-free Bat-Book,I'd probably squee with delight. His Atticus Kodiak novels are the bomb diggity,yo!!!
Posted 12/07/2009 at 09:16:18 PM
Geoff replied to longbowhunter:
I don't know, I haven't read one of his novels that comes close to his Gotham Central work. Although admittedly a lot of that was down to Brubaker being his partner on the series, and Brubaker's the best comic writer of the decade.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 02:37:26 PM
clashcty said:
I'm confused. Is that the american version of the japanese batman or the japanese version of the american batman?
Posted 12/07/2009 at 10:08:17 PM
Pocky D said:
Im willing to read them both mostly becouse the Batman comic looks kind of old school. Im also willing to give the Superman story ashoot becouse it being wrighten by JMS ... the man who did Babylon 5, Midnight Nation and so many other good comic book stories. I think we should give them a chance the most we will do is hate them and tell DC to go F theselves.
Posted 12/07/2009 at 11:16:09 PM
Xenos said:
Hmm. The interesting thing, and one big note that makes if different from Marvel's Ultimate line is that these are going to be full graphic novels, not single issues of comics.
Also, as for Batman Earth One, the Batman designs are fine, but Alfred looks almost too badass. I can see toughing him up a bit, but he looks almost like a war weary Green Arrow.
And yeah, poor Wonder Woman or any other DC character. Hopefully if this works we'll see them get a shot. Then again we already have Superman getting a new origin in Superman Secret Origins mini as did Green Lantern in the same titled series within his series. Green Arrow, Black Lighting, Huntress, and some others got a Year One titled mini series.
Meanwhile the creative means on these do sound good, so I think I will check them out.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 12:39:20 AM
Darth Davius said:
if this is coming , then why geoff johns is making superman secret origin? and what about batman confidential, many histories are fron batman early years, so ... what's DC excuse?
Posted 12/08/2009 at 01:02:35 AM
"Starman" Matt Morrison said:
I think it's pretty telling that Wonder Woman isn't joining Bats and Supers on this little endeavor, since her character is so screwed up no one knows what to do with her even if you start from scratch.
Spoken like someone who hasn't read Gail Simone's amazing run on Wonder Woman.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 01:30:42 AM
"Starman" Matt Morrison said:
I think it's pretty telling that Wonder Woman isn't joining Bats and Supers on this little endeavor, since her character is so screwed up no one knows what to do with her even if you start from scratch.
Spoken like someone who hasn't read Gail Simone's amazing run on Wonder Woman.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 01:32:47 AM
DoctorSmashy said:
Dude I had this idea like five years ago. Plus there was a kickass article in Wizard about what DC would be like if it pulled an 'Ultimate Marvel'. http://forums.toonzone.net/showthread.php?t=151634
Posted 12/08/2009 at 09:29:11 AM
Glass said:
Just keep Frank Miller the fuck away from Batman, FOREVER!
Posted 12/08/2009 at 02:00:36 PM
YoungZer0 said:
Ah, this is good news for me. I never got into the DC comics. After Dark Knight, i thought to myself: Give it a chance. Read some of it. Dropped it. Even Joker HC was fucking shite. The art was fantastic, but the writing/story was horrible. It made the sympathetic, anarchistic Joker you know from the movie into a murdering, raping, drug-using psychopath. This was boring shit, he's just another fucked up psychopath with a cut up face and no depth in his character. Not funny, not smart, not anything. While Bermejo tried a realistic look on the characters and the city, Azzarello simply fucked up by showing us a mad man running around randomly killing people. That really made me question Batman himself.
So yeah, this is good news for me. Let's hope the Earth One Joker is more like the one we know from the Movie.
Posted 12/08/2009 at 04:55:29 PM



