Friday, Dec. 11 2009 @ 10:35AM
 |
 |
12 comments
Comments
Dork Loser said:
SWEET!
Lithroe said:
Wow. Topless Robot, you are destroying my wallet. I want, I want, I want...
tvtastegood said:
If the grappling gun actually works I will take six of those bitches along with the motorcycle suit you posted a couple months ago then I could be batman. Aside from my limited income, lack of katana numbchuck and bo staff skills. That and I'm not a computer hacker.
On second thought I will just become a criminal talk about awesome the anti batman
David replied to tvtastegood:
That, my friend, sounds like a plan!
Slurpy said:
I would kill so many children to own those.
Wyngarde said:
How the hell can any one still like this boring piece of crap movie?
Keaton was terrible Jack was Jack with white crap on his face. Batman's ion the movie for about 17 minutes out of 2 1/2 hours while Keaton, who JUST BECAME Batman does what he can to quit.
Burton started a trend of "Ignore the source material and make what ever sucks" that still goes today. When we get and "Astro-Boy", "Constantine", "Catwoman" "Godzilla" or even Bayformers and G.I. Joke, it all goes back to the Burton rule of No Plot + Name Brand - source material X advertising = SHIT MOVIE.
Keaton needs a chin app. in the batsuit and a hair piece as Bruce Wyane.
I hate this movie with a passion. I don't know how anyone can like the character of Batman and like this movie or it's 3 craptastic sequels.
The Flash III replied to Wyngarde:
I watched it start to finish a couple of months ago and enjoyed it immensely. Keaton is a thinker, and a good actor I might add, which is good for the Batman. Someone should really have shown him how to kick properly, though. Nicholson looks like he's having fun doing everything he does, which is Jokerish enough for me. Making him the killer of Bruce's parents was a tad contrived, but not distracting enough to take away from the fun.
Now the rest of the Burton/Schumacher movies, I don't care to ever see them again--Though I did like Val Kilmer as Bats.
Dork Loser replied to The Flash III:
Funny, I thought I was the only one who thought Val Kilmer was a good Batman. Not good enough to keep that movie from being total crap, mind you, but still the best in the 20 year run from the first Burton movie. The good thing about the Burton movies was the dark Tim Burtony-feel they had. perfect for the end of the 80s and the disillusionment that the then pre-teen gen-xers would come to know. So it played a little with the story line. Compared to what they do in the comics now, no big deal.
dZus replied to Wyngarde:
Before you go around lampooning Tim Burton vision, sit back, have some tea and think about WHO THE FUCK CAME UP WITH THE MODERN LOOK AND FEEL OF THE BATMAN YOU ARE WATCHING AND (hopefully) ENJOYING NOW??
I don't rate the other 2 (or is it 3) bastardised movies after Burton's 2 visit of Gotham either, I don't know how you can fault Burton for those because they are not his.
So show a bit of respect and less ignorance.
Wyngarde replied to dZus:
Hey! Go check out the name of the producer on "Batman Forever"...IT's...TIM BURTON! Who HAND-PICKED Joel for the sequels...
So there. They are his. And "Batman & Robin" followed his formula of "Big, miscast stars + crap on source material = Burton Batman movie".
So uh, DZus...Please show a bit of respect and less ignorance.
StormSigma said:
Those look like cheap fanmade crap. Anyone who would pay that for those is a moron.
But then, toy nerds never cease to amaze at what they'll spend on complete crap just because it features their favorite property.
Atlas said:
Does the gun work?
If so, i am buying one.
