I had a bigger head-start than usual on you folks in viewing this one, and by now you've probably seen my positive-with-reservations review. Suffice it to say I'd rather see the sequel than this one, though I did enjoy the slightly new take on zombies.
But I never finished the book, and I know the radical differences are a big point of contention. Now that many of you have had a chance to see it, have it out below.
And why do you think the marketing avoided showing the zombies in any detail, or naming them by name, when the movie does so with no problems?