![]() |
Let's be completely honest here: comic characters usually never make the best decisions when it comes to their superhero costumes. Sometimes, it's simple color clashing. Other times, the character adopts a rather ridiculous gimmick and ends up running way too far with it (see recent Caveman Batman for taking motifs to a level of completely fucking nuts). Then there are complete fashion travesties. And we get it: times change and fashions change. It's why the X-Men wore bell-bottoms for a while or why Superman sported a mullet during the '90s. But every now and then, a comic character includes in their getup something that makes no goddamn sense.
We're not talking about a guy running around in a banana hammock -- and nothing else -- for no apparent reason other than some loose connection to water. We're not talking about a character that simply looks ridiculous. No, the people on this list apparently decided one day to completely forgo practicality and don a costume that defies logic, impedes the wearer in some way or makes no sense whatsoever... or a frightening combination of all three.
[Ed's note: I didn't write this, Teague and Kevin did. I just can't list two authors on an article yet. So don't blame/praise me, it's their damn fault. --Rob]
16) Wonder Man's Safari Jacket
15) Cable
14) Vibe
![]() |
13) Rogue
![]() |
12) Jericho
![]() |
11) Dazzler's Roller Skates
10) Tyroc
9) Razorback
![]() |
Comments
Kevin said:
I somehow feel your PC-ness regarding Supergirl's skirt is a bit forced.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:21:37 AM
Duggy replied to Kevin:
I've never got the attacks on the female-costumes-with-skirts.
Take a one piece superheroine costume and people are fine with it (most of the time). Add a skirt and suddenly there's something wrong (She flies! We can see up her skirt!).
It's incredibly stupid. We're not seeing her underwear, we're seeing part of her costume.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 01:10:31 AM
Apoth said:
My thoughts on Supergirl... seeing as how Superman was invented by a Canadian, and I have no idea if Supergirl was as well, but up here in Canuckistan, the 'legal' age *is* 16. Maybe that has something to do with it?
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:28:24 AM
The Yellow Dart replied to Apoth:
And the award for "Biggest Leap to Justify Child Pornography" goes to...
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:36:38 AM
Kevin replied to The Yellow Dart:
Calling Supergirl child pornography is a huge leap, itself.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:01:08 AM
Hibiscus replied to Kevin:
That's not even very much of a leap. These legal windows exist because they have to for there to be any law at all, not because they necessarily make any sense or meant to reflect some fundamental truth about the world. You're a fool if you think 16 year olds really do magically become adults on their 17th birthday in some biological or moral way, or that adult Canadian men who sleep with 16 year olds are just fine but American men who do the same are despicable pedophiles.
And calling this child pornography is just retarded.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:44:19 AM
Hibiscus replied to Hibiscus:
Oops. Meant to reply to The Yellow Dart. Now it looks like I'm disagreeing with Kevin.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:45:49 AM
No problem. :)
I'll admit it. I like when Supergirl is drawn is a short miniskirt and I think it's silly that they felt the need to give her biker shorts. I think it's because I view her as a comic book character that's already part of this huge fantasy world, and not an actual 16-year-old in the real world. Comic books objectify men and women. Guys have bulging muscles and the women are hot and mostly scantily clad. It's not to be taken seriously.
That's why when Topless Robot uses the #1 spot on a daily list about comic book characters to preach about Supergirl's skirt length, it's laying it on a bit thick. Her skirt is certainly not the most impractical costume on this list, and its placement at #1 seems to be just so the article can preach about how you're basically a pedophile if you think Supergirl is hot (which I damn well guarantee you, most of the readers do). It comes across as high and mighty, and being aghast at something that's in reality pretty trivial.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:22:48 AM
Kiwi replied to Kevin:
She can fly at superspeed. She is 16.
*Flies to Great Britain, France, Germany, Norway, Iceland, Spain, New Zealand, or Australia . . . runs out of interest in posting*
Not pedophilia any more. guess what guys, America isn't the whole world, fancy that.
Posted 02/04/2010 at 05:41:13 AM
Oliver replied to The Yellow Dart:
She isn't, strictly speaking, human, like Superman himself, so how can it be child pornography?
Posted 12/31/2009 at 11:03:49 AM
Arcane replied to Apoth:
Age of Consent ranges all across the US as well. 16 is legal in Pennsylvania, 17 in Virginia.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 08:47:28 PM
Ranchoth said:
You know, I've heard it said that a good measure of a Marvel comics character is the size and complexity of the character's head.
Perhaps Stryfe up there is trying to bootstrap himself up...or he requires an elaborate radiator system to keep his head fluids from boiling over.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:35:07 AM
Either way, I bet its tough for him to go through doorways.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:18:47 AM
lou-bert vs. q-bert replied to bort:
Ummm, I'm not really into Cable, but wasn't Stryfe a villain?
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:25:55 AM
Anonymous replied to lou-bert vs. q-bert:
Razorback is a villain too.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 03:53:32 PM
Nightcrawler666 replied to Ranchoth:
No mention of the giant metal codpiece?
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:21:01 AM
calvin replied to Nightcrawler666:
no mention of giant metal nipples? those things dwarf batman's "batman and robin" nips... seriously?
"Yeah its no big deal, its just totally diamond encrusted with a titanium base."
Posted 12/29/2009 at 04:20:20 PM
ZADL said:
Re: Red Sonja - perhaps those are the only parts of her that are vulnerable?
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:37:28 AM
Butts_McCracken said:
Great list, but you forgot Nightwing's original costume--the glittery, colorful, V-neck suit. It looked like something the disco era coughed up into the DC universe, what John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever would've looked like if it were a superhero movie.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:44:00 AM
CTrees said:
The main image of Cyclone on Wikipedia indicates that no, she indeed does not wear underwear under that skirt: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/dd/Maxinehunkel2.jpg
On a completely unrelated note, I have a new favorite superhero.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:58:25 AM
Anonymous said:
Very surprised Vartox didn't appear here, especially after his recent appearance in Supergirl
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:11:53 AM
"Starman" Matt Morrison replied to Anonymous:
That was Power Girl, actually.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 12:54:22 PM
keepoffthegrass said:
I've never heard of "Codpiece", but it seems like hes intentionally stupid....I actually think its funny it its meant to be a parody. What comic is he from?
I'd find out on my own but I'd rather not google the word "codpiece".
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:15:29 AM
ZADL replied to keepoffthegrass:
He showed up in Doom Patrol when it was being published by Vertigo.
http://www.againwiththecomics.com/2008/11/thanksgiving-turkeys-codpiece.html
Don't worry, it's a SFW link. At least, as SFW as an image of a guy with a boxing-glove jumping from his crotch can be.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:37:48 AM
bort said:
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/fashion-swat/comic-swat.php?page=12
My favorite comment about the X-Force cover is "Oh, those are pouches?! I thought they were wearing ballet skirts."
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:26:42 AM
Chris Sanders said:
Uh what about WITCHBLADE... Armor that barely covers ANYTHING. huh ? She beats Red Sonja by a MILE.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:32:03 AM
Kevin replied to Chris Sanders:
I don't think anyone reads Witchblade for the realism. Of course, that applies to everyone here.
And I just might be one of Dazzler's biggest fans (or at least one of the most vocal and shameless), but I have to admit that you have a good point about the roller skates being useless on shag carpet.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:44:32 AM
rickicker said:
feel the might of my JUNKCANNON!!!
now if you'll excuse me, i need to roll up into a ball and cry like a baby waaaaaay over there
Posted 12/29/2009 at 10:55:04 AM
ryan said:
I would disagree with about 60% of this list. For instance, Rogue? Impractical because her costume doesn't cover her face? I don't buy it. Jericho . . . impractical because it looks like a renaissance fari costume? The Safari jacket impractical on Wonder Man?
I'm not saying that these aren't bad costumes (except for Rogue, I like that one), but not impractical.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:00:45 AM
The Thriller replied to ryan:
I concur. Rogue actually purposefully doesn't cover her face as she would often kiss the villain she was fighting to take their powers mid fight.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 12:58:16 PM
TheRedQueen replied to The Thriller:
I agree. Rogue's costume isn't as impractical as her daily wear. Watch any X-Men cartoon from the 90s and anytime she's in common clothes, she's wearing a sleeveless shirt with gloves that don't go above the wrist. To top it off, she wears shorts in many episodes.
And if we're talking impractical coats, what about Jubilee? Hi, like my floor length bright yellow trench coat? It's so easy to run. I think it goes perfectly with these high tops, neon pink shirt and blue jams.
IDK, but if you ask me, dressing up as a huge rhino seems impractical.
Posted 01/27/2010 at 09:25:55 PM
akiratrooper said:
I felt like a part of me died when I saw the JUNKCANNON. WHOSE RESPONSIBLE THIS?!
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:03:46 AM
Drakonnen said:
I hate hearing this crap about Supergirl's panties.
It's not like she was flying around with a fucking thong on.
She had a cheerleader style outfit so I'd assume she'd have cheerleader style blue bloomers under there, which, though shaped like panties, ARE NOT PANTIES.
Cheerleaders to kicks, flips, aerial maneuvers in those outfits and no one is saying "panty shot!" even if every one might still be looking up their skirt, lol.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:09:07 AM
maachubo said:
Codpiece?
OK, see, you're making that one up. Trying to put one over on us. I'm on to you. You almost had me there, tho.
Codpiece...*snicker*
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:20:16 AM
james replied to maachubo:
http://failblog.org/2009/12/27/toy-missile-launcher-fail/
Apparently, hes got a secondary career going...
Posted 12/29/2009 at 02:04:42 PM
NettieBoo said:
Ah, Rob Liefeld... the man who adores pointless and extraneous pouches but can't draw feet (and a lot of other things).
Reminds me of that ProgressiveBoink article from a few years back. http://progressiveboink.com/archive/robliefeld.html
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:41:02 AM
kevsama said:
Rogue is the only one i disagree with because 1- I fucking love Rogue and 2-That's an awesome costume. It would be on the list if it had a mask, not without.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:43:01 AM
SpiderHyphenMan said:
Codpiece is fucking hysterical and I will not hear another word about it. I mean, shit, Watchmen says that any superhero who dresses up in spandex, leather, or rubber and beats up a bunch of guys obviously has some sort of sexual hangup. This just takes it a step further.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:56:05 AM
Hmmm... said:
Fortunately, Razorback met his end in Time Bandits. Don't ever pick a fight with Sean Connery!
Posted 12/29/2009 at 12:38:45 PM
"Starman" Matt Morrison said:
Good list, though I'd disagree with including Red Sonja as she isn't technically a superhero. If the list were 16 Incredibly Impractical Comic Book Character Costumes, okay...
Besides...
a) her outfit is technically scalemail - not chainmail.
b) it's no more ridiculous than Conan running around the frozen tundra in nothing but a fur loincloth.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:00:16 PM
dirty diego said:
OK, Codpiece I can agree with. And blame for Rob Liefield and his crap for Cable and Stryfe.
But some of them were cool. I like Rogue, Red Sonya, Catwoman, SuperGirl and Dazzler. How can you not like Dazzler and her deep cleavage?
For all it's worth, I'm surprised Black Widow, Spider Woman and Hellcat weren't in this lineup. Or how about Rhino and Vulture?
Kind of a lame article for me.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:07:56 PM
demoncat said:
rogue i would have to also disagree for her costume works to keep her powers from always stealing some ones life force or powers. as for super girl the wrtiers were proably trying to keep her tied to todays girls fashions though this list proves that comic artists are not fashion experts. plus suergirls short skirt got dc editors so mad they degreed no more. for her . besides surprised wonder woman did not make the list. as for penance think some one at marvel was trying to fullfill their new warrior sand m fantasy.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:23:20 PM
Scortia said:
Jay's hat has always bothered me. Even as cool as those little head lightning bolts that Barry, Wally, and Bart sport, they should have ripped off and flung into pedestrian's heart by now.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:31:53 PM
Black Alex said:
I have to argue in favor of Stryfe's costume. He was always the "man behind the curtain" so big heavy armor is fine since it is intended for intimidation rather than mobility. If that wasn't reason enough, his powers are telepathy and telekinesis, neither of which are hindered by movement. If anything, protecting his body is the smartest thing he could do. As for the spikes, what are telekinetics always missing? Sharp objects. He's got all of his bases covered.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:37:10 PM
Adam E. said:
Codpiece was above and beyond number one on this list. Not only did his weapon mean everyone would be attacking his crotch, but think about the recoil every time he fired that junk cannon.
After seeing him in the number two spot, the reason for Super Girl taking the top spot was unimpressive. Maybe if she was an eight year old, the case would be a lot more convincing...but she's sixteen and has super strength. What if some sick man tries to rape her? Well, then he's in for an ass-kicking and time in jail, and I sure don't care if her short skirt means one less rapist is out on the streets.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 01:48:36 PM
Catherine said:
She's legal in the Uk as well, lol.
Anyway, great list, gotta love chainmail bikinis. I'm getting one this Summer.....
Posted 12/29/2009 at 02:14:21 PM
akujaj said:
Codpiece and Cyclone should have their own team-up comic!
Arghh! The POUCHES!
Posted 12/29/2009 at 02:40:37 PM
Geoff said:
Dazzler's costume may have been risque in the 70s, but, shit, a girl wearing that to a club these days would be the most conservative dresser in the room.
Didn't we have this list two weeks ago... oh, wait, that was a list about character revamps that turned out to just be whining about the costumes.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 02:45:49 PM
Evil Monkey Pope said:
Safari jackets are light weight. They aren't parkas. You won't sweat to death or have restricted movement while wearing one.
Why is it that Batman is the only character that doesn't get picked on for his pouches? Utility pouches are the definition of practicality. They just aren't fashionable. Why would you go into an unknown supervillain situation without someplace to hold your communicator, flashlight, first aid kit, swiss army knife, change, lockpicks, gun, ammo, vehicle remote control, gasmask, villain restraints, etc? And if you have the foresight to have a utility belt in your costume, you will make a point of memorizing which items atre in which pouches. Don't perpetrate the myth that only Batman knows how to use a utility belt. That rich bastard already has enough of an ego.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 03:54:54 PM
Geoff replied to Evil Monkey Pope:
Because he didn't have the pouches for a good chunk of his history, and in fact only reverted to them after the pouch fad burned itself out.
They're perfectly fine if they're integrated into the costume (the black-and-blue Nightwing outfit has them on the gloves in a way that's so tough to see that some artists forget them outright) or are kept minimalistic like the old utility belt (Dick's gone to a less pocket-y belt anyway)
Posted 12/29/2009 at 05:44:44 PM
Brendan said:
At least Supergirl and Cyclone don't look like they are wearing nothing but body paint, as seems to be the norm for most super heroines.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 04:12:46 PM
FuryOfFirestorm said:
The Flash's hat actually came in handy against Eclipso. Jay used it to focus sunlight into a solar ray, which severely burned Eclipso.
Jericho doesn't wear that outfit anymore. Plus, his eyes (the focus for his powers) were gouged out, so now he's mute AND blind! *insert trumpet wah-wah sound here*
Yes, Codpiece was real. To add to his humiliation, he was beaten by a transexual (M to F) hooker who got "her" powers by sleeping with a radioactive creature that was both male and female! (No, not Dr. Frank-n-furter)
As for Penance, there are eye-slots for him to see through, but the artist apparently forgot to draw them. Plus, his outfit has been modified and the spikes have been removed.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 04:23:39 PM
Agent 86 replied to FuryOfFirestorm:
And now Jericho's eyes are back.
Posted 12/31/2009 at 12:46:38 AM
ChimpZealot said:
Supergirl's costume was designed by Ma Kent. Just let that sink into your brain for a while.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 04:34:40 PM
Mike said:
Seems to me that some of those scanty costumes that these hot superheroines wear would serve as a huge distraction when battling a super villain.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 06:02:23 PM
The Shadow said:
Just a few comments on an excellent piece of scholarly analysis:
Wonder Man: I must respectfully disagree with your assessment. Safari jackets, when tailored properly, do not restrict movement. Remember they are mostly worn by guys who need to avoid tiger claws and rhino horns when their rifle misfires. And I always thought Wonder Man had the best superhero costume ever. Imagine, the only superhero costume with POCKETS! What a novel concept.
Stryfe: I compliment you on your self-control on this one, and avoiding the obvious cheap laugh, but seriously, how could you give a withering assessment of this guy's fashion sense without mentioning THE HUGE METAL CROTCH PROTECTOR. Does Stryfe live in mortal fear of groin kicks, or is he overcompensating for something? What really amazing is that he's only wearing the list's SECOND most ridiculous posing pouch.
Red Sonja: My theory: closet masochist, with perhaps a touch of exhibitionism thrown in for good measure.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 06:30:24 PM
maachubo replied to The Shadow:
I just looked at Stryfe's picture again, and it appears that he has molded nipples into his breastplate.
I don't have any sort of witty response to this. Just...nipples on a breastplate.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 07:17:29 PM
Beppo said:
ChimpZealot: "Supergirl's costume was designed by Ma Kent."
Well, Ma Kent swings both ways. Not a lot of people know that.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 07:13:14 PM
The Fashion Police said:
Just gonna but in and say that's a smoking jacket, not a safari jacket.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 07:21:55 PM
Hmmm... replied to The Fashion Police:
I beg to differ. THIS is a smoking jacket:
http://jacketupload.macmillanusa.com/jackets/high_res/jpgs/9780312312619.jpg
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:20:02 PM
JoeMoe79 said:
Geee...from the reaction to Cyclone, Red Sonja and SuperGirl I thought this was written by a woman
Posted 12/29/2009 at 07:51:46 PM
Robert Paulson said:
I see absolutely nothing wrong with 8, 3, or 1.
And I WISH that today's comic book author's would grow the balls to create a character like Codpiece.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 07:55:33 PM
_JM_ said:
No idea how he keeps the hat on but Jay Garrick has used it as a weapon, though when he throws it on purpose he doesn't decapitate people. Comes from the decades of practise as a superhero and superspeed meaning even if he takes his time it still only takes a split-second for him to aim and throw it. :)
Posted 12/29/2009 at 08:56:34 PM
Mac said:
This list is for the most impractical costumes, not for the ugliest, most worthy of outrage, etc. If I were a female hero, it would be highly impractical to fly around in a skirt, underwear on display, or for me to try to kick someone's ass while battling painful chainmail rash.
And yes, it's also completely gross to sexualize a 16-year-old, even if she's fictional and pretty. Rob is awesome for noting that.
Posted 12/29/2009 at 09:17:06 PM
longbowhunter said:
Whats wrong with seeing Supergirls panties? Seigel and Shuster would have wanted to see Supergirls panties....besides,shes way older than 16. She was in hyper-sleep for how many years? Technically,shes older than Supes. Also,Kryptonian girls mature way faster than earth girls....I'm sure the kryptonian age of consent is much younger than here on earth. Plus,she has super-powers....if she didnt want guys looking up her skirt,she could just fry them with her heat-vision or snap their necks....right?
Posted 12/29/2009 at 11:16:27 PM
Jeff said:
Its ok to have messed up shit like codpiece but not in "normal" un parody comics.
he shouldnt have anything that fires projectiles right in Front of his junk.
Its degrading to super heroes to be shot by something that was between a guys legs.
Supergirl is probably wearing a cheerleader skirt that has the built in underwear.
Shes legal age in canada so its ok for us to look at her
Posted 12/30/2009 at 01:23:18 AM
longbowhunter replied to Jeff:
Only if you're canadian....apparently. My above post was kind of/sort of joking,but I've honestly never really thought about Supergirls age...I've also never imagined her in a sexual situation. Panties or under-tights,she's just another half-naked superhero in tights as far as I'm concerned. I do wonder why people complain about Supergirls upskirts,but nobody ever says a word about Robin and Kid Flash's bulging codpieces...or the fact that in a title called TEEN Titans,both Donna Troy and Starfire ran around with their chests nearly exposed?
Posted 12/30/2009 at 01:34:25 AM
Jeff said:
Codpiece could be charged with sexual assault when he fought a female super hero
Posted 12/30/2009 at 01:33:06 AM
Ralph Mouth said:
I find it quite sad that you are always preaching about Supergirl's panties on Topless robot. What is the problem? You seem offended by her panties showing. Do you prefer boys? I mean seriously. What guy complains that hot as hell Supergirl's panties are showing.....good god man! I bet you and the guys at the gay bath house have debates on the subject.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 03:27:57 AM
The Father of all Comic Geeks said:
Ok, First off I have to say. Supergirl's upskirts are an unavoidable problem she would have in REAl life yes. However, The artists are not drawing her spread eagle in the air, while holding up her skirt. Usually when the angle calls for her panties to be in view, like she's been thrown into a wall, her skirt modestly moves it's self into place it seems. I do agree that it's better now with the shorts under the skirt. However no one has mentioned Mary Marvel has the same problem and she's only seventeen.
As for completely useless and impractical Superhero costumes. How did the Phantom lady get left off the list. If any villain picks her up by her costume she's gonna get a heck of a wedgie.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1HeEKH3p41c/SYBYVxh8EvI/AAAAAAAAAzI/vFclrVEOwQ4/s400/Phantom_Lady__colored_by_SuperMichaelMan.jpg
Not to mention Deathstroke killed pretty easy without any armor.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 11:14:17 AM
Enigma_2099 said:
Codpiece... CODPIECE?!?!? Are you fucking kidding me?!?!?
Posted 12/30/2009 at 11:17:21 AM
Josiah said:
I'd say Penance is more of a goth icon really. Cutting has always been more of a goth thing anyways, some shit about the pain making them feel more alive or something.
The emo kid is more likely to just sit and write about how sad he is in the journal he's always carting around or write a song about he ex girlfriend of 3 years on his acoustic guitar while wearing some shitty old sweater he probably found in his grandpa's closet.
Just clearing up what seems to me to be a pretty common misconception.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 04:27:13 PM
Canuck said:
It scares me how many Canadians think 16 years old is legal age.. it's only the legal age for people under 18.. Adults still have to abide by that 18 year old instantly an adult rule.
Great list!
Posted 12/30/2009 at 07:33:59 PM
Zorpheus said:
Re: Red Sonja, her costume is even more funny when you take into account that her being brutally raped was her motivation to become a warrior.
Posted 12/30/2009 at 08:05:48 PM
thelordofhell said:
I guess nobody's heard of Vampirella......
Posted 12/31/2009 at 01:00:40 AM
amarygma said:
What? No Jubilee? Why would someone from the Sunshine State wear a giant yellow rain slicker as her costume?
Posted 12/31/2009 at 04:51:43 PM
Scott Hedrick said:
Chainmail Bikini: at one of my first scifi conventions, just as I arrived, I saw a gal wearing a chainmail bikini get out of a van. Now, while she may not have been of Red Sonja proportions, she wore it very well. With nothing underneath. I could tell because pubic hair kept poking through the bottom. I also have to wonder how she got it so form fitting without repeatedly trying it on; I have to assume she didn't try it on before because, if she had, she'd have known to wear some padding. By the time she got to the hotel entrance, she was walking bent-over and there was blood dripping from the top. I saw her several times later at the con, but never in the chain mail. Chain mail was meant to block piercing weapons and was worn over padding and/or leather.
Posted 12/31/2009 at 04:53:12 PM
Rebecca G said:
Supergirl has been suffering this decade, I remember her outfit from JL the animated series, it looked like she barrowed the skirt from one of the Saior Moon cast.
Posted 12/31/2009 at 05:08:15 PM
Skif said:
Actually Jays hat is fairly practical. He has used it on several occasions. Also if it did fly off, hes the damned flash, a .00002 second detour and its back on his head.
I remember once, he flung the hat at break neck speeds and then struck it with a punch the speed of light to produce a sonic-concussion wave that could have made Hellen Keller deaf.
Posted 12/31/2009 at 05:39:56 PM
'Stater Nuts said:
Supergirl was 16 when she arrived, it's been close to two years inside the DCU already. Maybe three.
Posted 12/31/2009 at 10:13:53 PM
Asat said:
The problem with Flash's hat is not that it might fall off so much as it is extremely difficult to conceal while in civilian mode. "Oh hi, Jay! Say, that's a nice bowl of fruit you're carrying around today. Much nicer than that turtle sculpture you had last week. By the way, what the hell is wrong with you anyway?"
Posted 01/01/2010 at 05:19:54 AM
Eric Fine said:
To my surprise Squirrel Girl is not on the list.
Posted 01/02/2010 at 03:38:58 PM
John said:
Excellent list! The writing definitely made me laugh.
As for Rogue: why doesn't she cover her face? It's so we can see her face. After all, no other female hero covers her face... except Catwoman, who's also on the list. Hmm...
As for Red Sonja: I think there's a law of some sort that says all fantasy characters must be dressed in impractical armor and wield huge swords.
As for Supergirl, technically speaking, she's over 50 years old since she first appeared in a 1958 comic book.
However, the argument can be made that she's *supposed* to be a 16 year old. But it's hard to agree on a standard body shape if so many artists are drawing her: sometimes she looks 16 and sometimes she looks 26.
I agree with the poster comparing Supergirl's outfit to a regular cheerleader: the outfit is simply a leotard with a skirt. Would the outfit get the same reaction if it was a leotard without a skirt?
Posted 01/02/2010 at 05:00:33 PM
Amy Jones said:
Actually Supergirl isn't 16, she's older then Superman, but due to suspended animation she still looks like a teenager. She still may sometimes act like a teenager, but she has said herself that she wasn't always "asleep," and a lot of that comes from not living in a real world.
In any case, she was labeled as "17" by Green Lantern in second issue of Brave and the Bold, and she recently celebrated her birthday in her own title. As she matures and grows, she is probably more 18 or 19 physically.
I don't get why people knock her costume. She wears just as much, if not more than Wonder Woman (not to mention her other self, Kara Zor-L/ Power Girl), but it's just fine for Diana to be wearing that.
Even if it's drawn more like actual armor than the bikini of old, she's not Kryptonian invulnerable, and we see her get cuts upon gashes, so why isn't that in this list?
Kara is a mature enough young woman to exude both innocence and sex appeal, as she always has since she lost the pig tails of Linda Lee almost half a century ago and graduated into Linda Lee Danvers. DC does recognize that there are limits, and the 8th Grade incarnation of Supergirl wore tights under the skirt.
A coworker of mine, a young woman herself, once commented that "super girls can do anything a super man can, AND twirl around on high heels. If you're invulnerable and look as good as that, you'll wear whatever you want to."
In any case, despite not celebrating the 50th anniversary of Kara's last year, rumor has it that in the upcoming 50th issue, Kara will have a new costume, and less skin showing. May the Quakers rejoice!
Posted 01/04/2010 at 01:39:26 AM
Amy Jones said:
As for the impracticality of a skirt, no female super hero is going to just hover in a position for someone to see anything unless they'd want that. Flying would be at a speed where the normal human eye isn't going to register ...
Besides, Kara basically wears a skirt as decoration over shorts or smaller. No one complains that Wonder Woman ISN'T wearing a skirt to offer more privacy, or the fact that unless Superman is wearing a lead jock strap, his stuff would be visible for the lustful eye. (Remember when people were trying to point out a bulge in Brandon Routh's uniform?)
In any event, even if it wasn't practical, I'd say that wearing a giant boar's head probably beats out issues with a skirt, lol.
Posted 01/04/2010 at 02:04:14 AM
Nite Owl said:
Seriously, people want to comment on Codpiece and no one has mentioned on Doctor Manhattan's "costume?"
Posted 01/08/2010 at 04:05:52 PM
Blair said:
I don't see what is impractical about Dr. Manhattan's costume, or lack thereof. He is a being of energy with infinite powers who is not bound by the laws of human-based physics. How would any costume he would wear be impractical at all?
On the same note, I don't see what is impractical about a girl who is more powerful than a locomotive and faster than a speeding bullet wearing a short skirt. "Impractical" implies that it interferes with whatever function it is supposed to perform. The potential of being leered at for a fraction of a second by bystanders 100 meters below her has no effect on her crime-fighting abilities. If anything, it is more practical because she can distract criminals with her nubile figure (a tactic Power Girl openly admits to).
And don't lay the ephebophile argument on me either. Thanks to Smallville, I associate Supergirl with Laura Vanderhoort, and if anyone would like to ridicule me for finding her attractive, please, go ahead.
If you're going to make the argument of skimpy costume = impractical, don't go after Supergirl. At the very least, go after someone like Vampirella or Emma Frost, whose costumes could not realistically remain costumes without a generous helping of superglue.
Posted 01/13/2010 at 04:27:36 PM










