Wow..the girl in the bottom picture is actually MORE airbrushed than the one in green body paint.

Because all Orion women look alike? Is that it?

Kirk's a racist!

I for one prefer the more voluptuous Orion Slave Girl. She's more XX and she knows it.

I gotta go with Rachel Nichols on this one. Ignoring the bra and panty aspect (as hard is it is to ignore that!) I think that Rachel looks much, MUCH better in green than does Diora.

So were these two girls supposed to be playing the same part in the same movie? I'm confused.

Rachel Nichols was better in the role. I liked her character, she was bubbly and energetic, fun to watch. Granted, this other chick didn't have much to work with, but even if she were in the movie, I wouldn't have remembered her.

Push?

Uh, no. There is no universe where breasts look like that naturally. The extreme fake-ness of that photo distracts from any potential hotness. Also, it would hurt a hell of a lot to be that skinny and have breasts that large.

Compare the chick's boobs from the video to the fake photo...she can't be more then an A cup. I would know, I'm a DDD. (Yes, really).

Zidel makes a good point. Actually, she makes two of them.

I hate to admit how much "research" I've done on Diora Baird, but I assure you all they are real and, as the saying goes, they are spectacular.

Well, then it's obvious the her Slave Girl scene was prior to her breast enhancement. Which would make Rob's original argument moot -- she just wasn't as chestacular at the time of filming. I rest my case bitches!

I heard.... somewhere that they are real, bizarrely. Good work, God!

@Zidel

Do a Google image search on Diora with teh safe search off.
Those images you see are at least three years older than her role on Star Trek.

What might have been

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/474/diorabairdorionl.jpg

Well seeing how real Orion "Slave" Girls aculty enslave their masters I would say that's a good thing

Bah, breast size aside, I can see why they would chose Rachel Nichols wholesome girl-next-door appearance over Diora Bairds skanky pornstar look.

Yeah, Rachel is much, much sexier than Diora. First of all, Diora has a big rack, yes, but... the rest of her sucks. I couldn't have sex with a pair of boobs when the rest of her body (especially her face) makes me want to vomit.

Rachel is beautiful. She has hair I just want to run my hands through... a face I could look at all the time... those beautiful hips... and a nice a rack to top it off.

JJ Abrams, you made the right choice!

Eh, they're both the same to me. Green.

Sorry, I'm a Rachel Nichols man all the way. That picture of her, all green in a bra and panties, always puts a smile on my face. The other girl is rather generic in my eyes, but that's me.

To the people who are saying diora's rack is real, have you seen real boobs? I'm not making a call either way but I really haven't seen too many pairs of real boobs where the nipple is up that high on the breast. They don't look like bolt ons, granted, but not all implants are created equal. I find it difficult to beleve they're 100% natural. And I agree that rachel Nichols is much hotter In a real life sorta way.

Having never seen fake boobs, I can't really make a call on this one. Speaking as a man if either of them were in front of me naked I would give them the most awkward 35 seconds of their lives. If the two of them were there at the same time, 10 seconds. So who am I to judge.

Whether or not she has "enhancements" in real life, that last photo is just obviously doctored. Let's break down the anatomy of her chest: her breasts begin at her clavicle! Look at that picture and imagine where her nipples are (if you haven't already,) and if that isn't weird enough for you, stand her up so that gravity is pulling those suckers down and take away the bra holding them up and you'd have some malformed titties! If they were real, they'd be down to her bellybutton, if they were fake and didn't move with gravity, they'd be oblong with nipples pointing down and in different directions like a hammerhead shark.

The Diora Baird in that picture would have made a much better alien.

Part of me wants to believe the boobs are real... But, alas, I cannot. She's a beautiful woman with a beautiful face, but those are photoshopped or something. Not just larger than her head, but substantially larger than her head. Is this some trick of the camera angle? Is her head much much further away than her boobies?

That's hilarious. Wish is stayed in the final cut.

And not that anyone cares about acting chops when it comes to this, but Dior bairds entire career is pretty much based around her titties. She's not known for her film work, which is pretty much relegated to two second bit parts with very minimal speaking parts if any. Perhaps there's a reason Rachel Nichols got the part that had, yknow, dialogue. Not that nichols is the female Daniel day Lewis when it comes to acting, but compared to diora Baird, Nichols is a Christopher lee level veteran.

And bairds boobs, if you loom at other photos, actually do make very little sense. There is no shortage of tittie shots of diora and trust me they're all weird. Her boobs hang very awkwardly, and her nipples are very high up on the breast. It's quite unsettling.

As someone of the female persuasion can I offer that boobs are 60% optical illusion. My guess is that the two ladies are similarly endowed. The only difference is that Nichols is an Amazon.

As far as the photo of Baird. She has a push up bra on which means that everything under that seam across the center of her bust is padding. She's on her back and you can tell from the wrinkling at her shoulders and the tension in her jaw that she has her hips elevated slightly to force her boobs to sort of float. It screws with the perspective and makes her head look tiny and her collar bone disappear. She's also squeezing her arms across her middle which allows her to use her upper arms to hold and elevate her breasts. She might as well be wearing them as a hat.

And, yes, I used to work for Playboy.

Diora Baird would look like She-Hulk in green. Her face shape is too masculine.

That is so bogus.

Kirk doesn't apologize for shit.

Ahem. Those are Orion CADET girls.

Have a little respect.

Diora Baird > Rachel Nichols
Hands down
And who gives a FUCK about real vs fake. My erection can't tell the differences which aren't worth two shits unless they've been butchered. And addition to those massive man-eaters, she has generally more pleasant features all around, even after controlling for airbrushing I honestly can't see how this is to hotly debated, but to each his own I guess. But in either case, the green cause both to veer off into fugly territory. Never understood the allure of the green Star Trek woman, but then again I've never really been a fan.

I love you like a brother, man, and I agree with you on many a point, but taste in women? Not so much. However, it means we would make excellent chick-scamming partners; You could hit on all the aquiline, lithe chicks, I could hit on all the soft-featured, cutie-pie chicks, and we'd never get in each other's way! (as we were soundly rejected by both types of chicks. sad face.)

Diora Baird's boobs do not look fake at all. Not even slightly.

You people are fools clinging to the lame "anti-big-boob's to show I am enlightened" school of thought.

What's wrong with you all? Why can we have both??

I seriously don't understand the whole obsession with big boobs. They look ridiculous when they're bigger than the girls' head. Rachel Nichols is far prettier and her boobs are sufficiently large. Also, Nichols has more muscle definition.

Diora's boobs are completely real, as documented in about 3 billion places online. Also, Diora is an excellent reason to join Twitter. Otherwise, Twitter's awful, but just follow her; I promise you'll be entertained.

Well a good airbrush job then.