But the new Topless Robot is more than just good looks! There's the new popular Tags bar, along with sidebars for the most popular articles and the most recently commented on. Yes, I know 9/10ths of other blogs already have things like these, but now I do, and that's why I'm excited! Oh, and now you the ability to reply to people's comments directly, so you guys can have your bitchy nerd fights more effectively (and the rest of us can ignore them more effectively). Now, there's aren't commenter profiles and log-ins yet, but they're still on the list, and they're coming. I promise I want them at least as bad as you scamps do. I'll keep you posted, promise.
Frankly, I think all of this is peachy keen, and I have a hard time imagining any of you guys complaining about any of the new functionality... with the possible exception of the new Topless Robot robot. If you do, you're in luck -- I'm announcing a new contest at TR today: Design a New Topless Robot for Topless Robot. Send me art of a new robot exemplifying toplessness (without being actually nude) that fits in the space above where the current robot is, and your work might become the new TR logo. Five entries will get Topless Robot t-shirts; the winner will get a shirt and $300 worth of nerdy shit, which I will purchase to make sure it's appropriately nerdy. Any robot style -- '50s, anime, wind-up toy, etc. -- is acceptable; the contest will continue until somebody's art knocks my socks off.
And that's it. I'm sure there are still a few bugs in the system, so feel free to email me if you see something not working right or not working at all. And thank all of you for sticking with TR long enough to make this new design possible. If I were your DM, I'd totally be giving you Treasure Type H right now in gratitude. Free maps and scrolls for everybody!
Comments
Mr. Poopoopachu said:
Looks great, Rob! Nice work and best of luck with it.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:23:38 PM
Live for Films said:
It's all clean and sparkly...like a teenage vampire.
I like it. The site revamp that is, not the teenage vampire
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:28:16 PM
nflsmc said:
Frankly, I find the picture of this article to be an acceptable topless robot.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:32:34 PM
Patracolos replied to nflsmc:
I agree, but there might be some nerdlings around here, and their parents might flip and write a poorly written letter to Rob and his host company... actually sounds like fun
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:07:18 PM
Danger Monkey replied to Patracolos:
Nerdlings? hope not , i cry with fear and disgust with FFF every week and i'm 37.....and love every minute of it hehehe
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:43:56 PM
Erica replied to Danger Monkey:
Yeesh, I was gonna say the pic in the article gave me the heebie-jeebies...
Posted 11/14/2009 at 08:16:51 AM
ClancyDamon said:
Awesome! An interesting color change from the black and yellow-ish scheme to this white and light blue, but another week of browsing should take care of that confusion. Congratulation on your new look and features! I look forward to many more mind-scarring, liver-destroying posts.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:32:51 PM
Greg said:
Can I try my hand at photographing you a new Topless Robot for the site?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:33:05 PM
MaxtotheMax said:
Personally I miss the purple color scheme, but all in all this new TR is looking sweet.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:33:44 PM
Chris Sanders replied to MaxtotheMax:
the logo is also not as solid as the original... it looks like a rejected old navy shirt design lol
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:52:06 PM
Katie said:
Oh, man! FFF and a site re-design?
And people think Friday the 13th is unlucky.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:34:09 PM
The Great A'Tuin replied to Katie:
With FFF, every Friday is unlucky. It's just a matter of how unlucky.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:49:30 PM
Orangutan said:
I like the layout, and the overall design, but it's awful... bright. I'm sure I'm not alone in liking darker backgrounds where possible. Any chance a couple different themes could be available when you get around to profiles and logins?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:34:33 PM
langgam replied to Orangutan:
I agree that it's too bright. Is it just me or I am already old that the brightness/contrast hurts my eyes. And the font too, a little bit hard to read.
Anyway, great re-design
Posted 11/13/2009 at 10:12:20 PM
Prodijy replied to Orangutan:
Agreed.....
I like the overall style of the site much better, but I would prefer the black background with brighter text back.
Posted 11/16/2009 at 08:09:09 AM
Merle said:
No issue with the new design. I look forward to the login/profiles of the future
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:36:42 PM
operations said:
Who is the person in the topless robot pic? Is that finally an image of Mrs. Robot?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:37:53 PM
operations replied to operations:
Also, love the clean new look (you all rest can forget it, the prior look was BADDDD... from a web design standpoint as well as good taste) and that you no longer carry a featured link to a website I hate.
Cheers!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:45:32 PM
Church replied to operations:
Yeah, sans-serif is so much easier on the eyes. :/
Posted 11/15/2009 at 08:26:29 PM
Hmmm... said:
I was just about to complain that you took away the archive, but I found it. The site looks great!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:39:46 PM
Mario said:
Am I the only one who misses the blue background?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:41:38 PM
SpiderHyphenMan said:
Still, there is the issue with the tags. Namely, when you click on a tag, it only goes back twenty entries. FIX IT
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:41:47 PM
operations replied to SpiderHyphenMan:
Don't you know that more than 20 posts is like going back to the bronze age in Internet terms?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:47:25 PM
Eric replied to SpiderHyphenMan:
It's been upped to 50 and pagination is in the works to go all the way back. @SpiderHyphenMan you can now see all the Self-Pleasure tags. Please clean the screen when you are done.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:53:26 PM
King Psyz is rocking with Eddie Riggs said:
Finally a contest I have a skill set for! Teh ideas are a comin!
Any limit on entries?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:45:57 PM
Rob replied to King Psyz is rocking with Eddie Riggs:
Nope. But you can only win once — if you enter five times I'm not giving you five shirts, natch.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:50:39 PM
King Psyz is rocking with Eddie Riggs replied to Rob:
too bad, it would take 5 shirts sewn together to make one wearable one
okay maybe only two...
Looking forward to the entries.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:49:40 PM
DoctorSmashy said:
Nicely done, son.... I do miss the darker background, but it's no biggie. Congrats and good luck!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:47:04 PM
Chris Sanders said:
Eh, I kind of wish the site wasn't so "light" Rob you hae a knack for darker humor, I think the site should not be so "heavenly" lol.. other than that it's dope !
It also now makes all of us with less impressively designed sites look like ARSE.
I'm excited about this contest too ! Woo!!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:48:48 PM
Slopoke said:
NNNOOOO!!
i like the tags and sidebar but i don't like the white.
it's so bright! i sit here in this nerd cave to avoid the sun and any approximation is just as bad to me.
sorry, i'm going to need to internet boycott you no. it worked for Left 4 Dead 2 and Modern Warfare 2!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:49:19 PM
BoSho7 replied to Slopoke:
I like the new design, but it was a little too bright for me too... that's why I switched some colors around! Like so http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/2678/ex1x.png
Other than the colors, I also wish the borders of the main stuff was a little wider. Other than that, great new layout!
Posted 11/14/2009 at 11:07:03 AM
ClancyDamon said:
Quick thing - the anchor tags for the comment section don't seem to be working, at least not with Firefox 3.0.15 (I need to upgrade, I know.) It just takes you to the top of the page, not down to the actual comment section. Anyone else have this problem, or is it just me?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 03:54:38 PM
Plaidstallions said:
Looks snappy, can't get the search function to work properly though.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:00:03 PM
Heimdall said:
Not bad. I have to admit that I was expecting the new look to consist entirely of a bunch of browser-choking ads (Yes, I do use Firefox and Ad Block, but even so). Or worse yet, become one of those sites that does that whole ad redirect thing.
So on that score, this was definitely a win.
(If you're taking requests, how about a "Preview" function for Comments?)
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:00:50 PM
Patracolos said:
Not bad Rob. Looks pretty good. I'm still trying to figure out why no contest, but still FFF.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:03:48 PM
Gunslinger said:
I... I don't know what I'm looking at in the banner, but it frightens me.
It frightens me greatly.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:04:55 PM
Jettwinlock said:
Awesome new design I didn't mind the old one but this one looks really nice.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:08:56 PM
longbowhunter said:
AGHHHHH!!! CHANGE IS SCARY!!!! I HATE THE NEW SITE AND EVERYTHING THAT COMES WITH IT!!!! YOU RAPED MY CHILDHOOD!!!! Oh wait-this is actually kind of OK....nevermind.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:16:29 PM
The Great A'Tuin replied to longbowhunter:
SITE IS RUINED FOREVAR! TRUKK NOT... THIS THINGY!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:11:00 PM
Elijah said:
Good times. Just one, tiny, inconsequential complaint... which is that individual articles look like shit in my Google Reader now. Since that's how I like at 95% of the internet that I look at, it's a little disappointing.
That is a fairly small problem, though.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:20:57 PM
Friginator said:
Neat. I was hoping we would be able to quote each other, but don't look a gift horse in it's new robotic tits...
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:22:05 PM
SpiderHyphenMan said:
A long time ago when I first discovered this site, there existed a giant list of every single tag that was ever used. I liked that list. Please bring it back.
Also,the lines on the side should be dark blue, the light blue boxes should be dark blue, but other than that I like it. It's just too bright.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:24:30 PM
Nyx said:
Looks great. Definitely digging the reduced load time as well, TR could bog my browser down pretty badly occasionally.
Now I have to decide if I want to do an entry or not... hm.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:25:08 PM
SpiderHyphenMan said:
Remember that giant tag list? Can we have that back?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:25:47 PM
Mad Mutt said:
Definitely TOO WHITE. Gizmo no like Bright Light either!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:26:17 PM
burninglily said:
As always, terribly thrilled with TR, especially with the new layout and design. You still rock my world and I am certainly going to be throwing my two cents in for the re-design of said TR.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:26:42 PM
Catherine said:
Nice. It's very different and I find change hard to deal with, but I still like the new design. Good work.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:33:30 PM
Catherine replied to Catherine:
Wait...the Heartless Doll link is gone from the top....ok, that's part of the update I'm not pleased with. I liked having that site close by. Now I have to actually scroll all the way down to the sister blogs box :-(
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:36:21 PM
Dengar said:
Me likey! Much needed upgrade. Just no stupid pop up adds like Superhero hype!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:35:51 PM
CChaos said:
Hey, snazzy new look!
An update for the site could only be a good thing. Looking good, Rob. I think the only item that could have made this better was registrations.
Otherwise though, definitely a thumbs up from me.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:41:23 PM
TED-209 said:
We fear change....(hits mechanical hand with hammer)
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:49:17 PM
Lithroe said:
Love the new look. I'm partial to darker colours, but I must say that this is pleasing on the eyes.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:50:39 PM
khaine said:
occasional poster - daily reader.
Looks good... as long as I don't get lost (the internet and I don't get along) all should be well.
got one of those posting doo-hickies where it'll email me when someone replies to my post calling me a jackass? Otherwise I'll mist many of the interweb insults flung in my direction...
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:51:27 PM
BorgQueen said:
I approve. You will not be assimilated... today. Maybe in addition to a new logo there could be a contest for a catchy song to go along with?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:51:56 PM
FuryOfFirestorm said:
I'm McLovin the new look!
Everyone responsible for the new TR gets a free BJ!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:57:38 PM
Skeletor said:
TR said: "Now, there's aren't commenter profiles and log-ins yet..."
Nice to know that in this crazy layout changing world, the one constant is still there: the drunken typos.
Love the new layout. A little white, but I think my eyes will adjust after a few visits.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 04:58:16 PM
Thatcher said:
Yeah, like most nerds I sit in a dark room most of the time and this is a little bright. Overall, though, i dig it.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:04:46 PM
Eponymous said:
I like the redesign overall... should maybe try a few different color schemes, just for the hell of it...
I will say that the new TR Logo isn't, well, honestly, feminine enough to go with the toplessness... I mean, when I think of boobs, I want to know that they are attached to a female and not something more ambiguous...
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:09:04 PM
Captain Spadge said:
What the? I hate it. Bring back the dark, my eyes are bleeding. And even if I somehow get past that, it looks generic, washed out, bland and boring...
No, sorry... Just no.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:10:22 PM
Beppo said:
I'd like to get it on with Dark Willow. Apropos of nothing.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:21:20 PM
Kench said:
Argh, even more stupid websense blocking issues. It was bad enough that I couldn't see the videos, now I can't even see article titles!
What I CAN see so far, though, looks great!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:27:58 PM
Baltimoron said:
Dig the fact that the site no longer looks like a LiveJournal circa 2001.
One change: put the Anti-Life Equation in the masthead and make us all your slaves.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:28:56 PM
Sebulba said:
I like it. Pulled it up on my iphone and it looks good there too, not that I recall any problems there to begin with.
*thumbs up*
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:39:45 PM
Ted said:
2 things I would suggest: a background image to break up all the white, and reducing the letter-spacing. Other than that, nice redesign
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:43:03 PM
ZeroCorpse said:
Oh, sure. First it's a slick new site design, then we'll be barred from saying "fuck" in the comments, and then Rob will hire a staff of ex-IGN bloggers who moderate the comments with their own brand of vindictive, overpowered-nerd dickery, and then finally Topless Robot will be bought by Yahoo and turned into a corporate shill site full of fake comments from marketing bots while Rob sits in a palace with Drew Curtis, Harry Knowles, and Eric Bauman sipping champagne and laughing!
Sure, the site looks good, and I'm happy for Rob, but I fear change when it comes to things on the Internet or my underwear drawer!
Good luck, anyway. Thanks for making it look cool for us, Rob.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:57:27 PM
ZeroCorpse replied to ZeroCorpse:
Oh, and I see I'll have to step up the HTML and exaggerate my carriage returns...
Like switching to boxers, man.... Like switching to Care Bears boxers.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 05:59:16 PM
Chris Ward said:
I ask you: what other nerd site has an entire header devoted to Rap? Besides maybe MC Chris' site.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:02:13 PM
DoctorSmashy said:
So does the new logo have to be a female robot? Is that a stupid question?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:11:33 PM
Neodymium said:
We fear change.
i want a dark background. How about some different themes or something?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:19:41 PM
Danger Monkey said:
I love the change to white background it's easier to camouflage with the other windows at work hehehe
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:28:46 PM
MrMacMan said:
Not really digging it.
Preferred a darker skin, any preferences for that anywhere?
guessing probably not...
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:28:58 PM
8den said:
Dr smashy you're rather have a man bot fire his moobies at you?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:28:59 PM
Nephilim of Sin said:
My eyes! My eyes! My God, what have you done!!!
It looks so clean, and sterile. I second the request for a dark background.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:32:53 PM
Lisencetowill said:
Woah that threw me off, it's so bright! Now how am I supposed to read FFF in the dark when my monitor is this bright.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:36:55 PM
Abraxas said:
awesome! now this is change I can believe in :D although I am a tad disapointed in the lack of fur content. I was looking forward to the yiffing.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 06:45:40 PM
animelover33 said:
I am a fan of the new design! It's so pretty. I am drawn like a moth to a flame. o.o
Although, for those who have been temporarily blinded, may I suggest using a different background color than white? Keep it bright, like another light color, just not white.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:01:40 PM
Gleeman said:
Whoa, I go away for a day and the human waste hits the rotating air moving device....
Actually the new layout looks good, but I'd agree it's a bit...white...
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:36:56 PM
Jimmy Suggs said:
Um no offense but the huge banner ad at the top of the page really overpowers the actual content. I realize you guys rely on ads to keep the site going but man, that one at the top is not only huge, it's the very first thing users see when visiting the site. Eyes are drawn to it instantly, which is great for the advertiser, but bad for the site itself. The message it sends to visitors is "Hi, get ready to be bombarded with ads!" The ad at the top of the page greatly overshadows the graphic with the name of the site and it basically overpowers any actual content you may offer. I'd strongly recommend finding a more subtle way to include your sponsored ads- what you have now sends a really negative message to your site visitors. You'll get more clicks on that ad, but the site itself will get far fewer impressions as a result. Just a thought.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:40:27 PM
JayTee said:
Yo, the top is hideous man. The rest is nice and clean though.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:45:18 PM
Awesome Thompson said:
Well holy skywalk, the site is so crispy! Love it, looks very clean.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:49:12 PM
Gleeman said:
Banner ad?
*pets Firefox*
"You're a good little web browser, aren't you?"
"Yes you are! Yes you are!"
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:51:10 PM
JimmyZappa said:
Well its slicker but I liked the old design better simply cause it was darker. It felt more...homey.
This one feels like a factory. If that makes any sense.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:57:05 PM
RageTreb said:
For what it's worth, I hate the new layout. White one white? Let's get some color in here!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 07:58:28 PM
drunkenhopfrog said:
Damn. I used to be happy that my site (PopBunker.net) looked better than TR. Now I not only have 1/1500 the readers but the new look kicks ass. Congratulations I guess. :D
Posted 11/13/2009 at 08:03:23 PM
SuperDevil said:
Why a Marvel banner and not a Comics banner? Why Star Wars and not Science Fiction? Why Transformers and not Anime?
Considering that you do post stuff on Superman and Batman, Star Trek and the Prisoner, GI Joe, etc.
The headers seem limited.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 08:43:10 PM
MooseBerry said:
It's..............beautiful. *_*
Seriously a huge step from what it was before! Great job!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 09:11:33 PM
Jking said:
Looks great!
I come here everyday for my daily dose!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 09:15:55 PM
Captain Spadge said:
Seriously, why the freaking SPERM theme and purple failbot? It hurts my eyes!
Posted 11/13/2009 at 09:46:22 PM
J.Cat said:
@Captain Spadge: Naw, you're wrong. It look way better than before.
Posted 11/13/2009 at 09:54:45 PM
Staxxvolt said:
Nice job. The site looks alot more stream lined.
Whos responsable this
Posted 11/13/2009 at 09:57:39 PM
cocacolaoso said:
What? Where? Who? When? The hell!?!? That was a very unexpected change! TR 2.0 looks so new ,so white, so clean and shiny my eyes hurt! All this so sudden! I feel lost and old and scared! Moooooommmmyyyyyy!
Congratulations Rob for the new look of Topless Robot. Salud to more nerd news, self loathing, snarky comments, bitchiness, witticisms, horrifing FFF, shameless nostalgia, WTFs, nerd riots and nerdgasms all in a gloriously bleached white background.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 01:03:51 AM
LBD "Nytetrayn" said:
Nice, I'm digging the new look and features. It's like going from Walkman to iPod.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 01:51:10 AM
Lord Alvarez said:
I love the new layout Rob. Also looking forward to those profiles and whatnot. I shall enter this contest as well. heh I'm just giddy.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 02:30:33 AM
Karma said:
It's garbage, I hate it, and it's terrible.
It's too bright, too generic looking, the font text is bad and too spaced out making it difficult to read, images are annoying, and the logo is exceptionally lazy.
This is just plain hideous graphic design from a website viewpoint, it's poorly made, generic, and tacky, half-assed and all over atrocious.
You should be ashamed of yourself for even acting proud of this. It's godawful.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 08:55:13 AM
J_S said:
Overall the new layout looks good, but it'll take some getting used to. I agree that it's quite bright though, maybe too much.
Before you change anything else, please please fix the letter spacing. Right now, it's hard to read.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 09:31:39 AM
ExecutorElassus said:
screw that: where'd you get the fembot picture for this article? My life was meaningless before I found out about fembots :(
Posted 11/14/2009 at 09:36:49 AM
Mr. Szasz said:
umm, the "C-3P0 stripper bot" is the robot from Metropolis dude. That movie is only one of the greatest achievements in sci-fi filmaking, but hey, not like this is a geek website or anything, I guess you don't need to know that...
Posted 11/14/2009 at 09:40:56 AM
Bunche said:
HATE the new look bigtime. The topless C-3P-ette was charming and had personality to burn, so why jettison her? If you must have a new robot, please go with something like a cheesecake version of Maria from METROPOLIS rather than a generic Shogun Warrior.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 10:14:39 AM
Bunche said:
And, yeah, I know C-3PO is a Maria knockoff in the first place, but I suggest her due to that very similarity to what you had in the first place. In fact, fuck that. Bring back your original mascot!
Posted 11/14/2009 at 10:16:55 AM
dmnyo said:
I honestly liked the old one better. sorry just my 2 cents in.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 10:26:13 AM
Kevin said:
I also agree that the header needs a little work. I like the new logo but think it needs to be bigger. There's too much empty space between it and the robot and it doesn't connect. Not to mention they're both being squeezed out by a huge ad banner.
I think what would overall help the design is a colored border around the edges. Everything being white makes it look too generic, too empty, in my opinion. I think it's great you've improved the functionality to resemble more modern sites and blogs, but I don't think you need to look just like every other site out there.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 10:57:23 AM
Anonymous said:
P l e a s e f i x t h e s p a c i n g .
The contrast is a bit harsh on the eyes, too. A darker background or border color would be less migrane-inducing whilst viewing a large number of posts in popular threads.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 11:18:06 AM
WEKS said:
WHOSE RESPONSIBLE THIS?
No but really, I liked the old style... this is too... modern.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 01:20:28 PM
Sylvia said:
Shiny and white. Rob, you've gone and apple'd the site haven't you?
It's pretty, but it looks legit. The old one was grimier and the institutions like fff didn't seem so incongruous.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 01:53:14 PM
Mitch HArden said:
You need an Adrienne Barbeau-bot with laser beam eyes and "D-Cups Full of Justice."
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3659/3419792166_71fd6aaa71.jpg
Posted 11/14/2009 at 02:00:30 PM
Acid Rainbows said:
I think it should be a little less bright as well. It's a touch blinding. Definitely going to need a new banner because this one just isn't quite cutting it.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 03:26:02 PM
Jennet said:
I like the new look! My layout eye has a problem with the text, though. The font is good, but the spacing is just too loose. The leading's fine, it's just the spacing between the characters. I know it sounds trivial, but it is affecting the look of the page. Even though you've designed for a lighter, more open look, you might want to scale it back a bit with the actual text.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 04:14:10 PM
Invader Toph said:
Loving the new digs man! It looks so shiny and neat.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 06:28:27 PM
October Road Films said:
Hell yeah!!! I LOVE IT! Welcome to the 21st century, dude!
Posted 11/14/2009 at 09:03:34 PM
NeoXorn said:
Wow! I Love the new design/layout.
More power, man!
Posted 11/14/2009 at 09:55:27 PM
coughman said:
must the new site be "i just created this website" eyesore WHITE???
nothing like blinding eyestrain while im trying to read articles
Posted 11/14/2009 at 10:16:05 PM
davelog said:
It's also about 50px too wide to fit on a 1024x768 screen without a horiz scrollbar.
Just an fyi for those web designers with giant widescreen monitors - web presentation is about the lowest common denominator. Web-safe fonts, colors, and sizes do not vary at your whim.
Posted 11/14/2009 at 11:33:49 PM
Anonymous said:
The new name design is like leet speak, Ro3ot
the be looks more like a 3.
looks pretty good,
I like the new topless robot girl, is she on the assembly line?
reminds me of the "Im a robot I can put my arm back on, you cant so place safe" commercials haha
Posted 11/15/2009 at 01:28:11 AM
jeff said:
Shes not topless if shes got a logo on her tits.
The c3po one got to bare it all, just cus this one looks like a real woman-one whos an amputee cyborg- doesnt mean she cant show what shes got
Posted 11/15/2009 at 01:36:28 AM
Bugdodger said:
I actually like the sterile look of the white, but I agree that the header does look... unfinished? There isn't anything bringing the two pieces together. Not sure if its the lack of border to frame it in together, or the huge add that is currently covering part of the logo, but I find myself just glazing past the whole piece.
I didn't mind the font spacing too much at first, it isn't bad in short comments, but once you hit paragraph status it does start to just look like a wall of letters with nothing breaking it up.
Posted 11/15/2009 at 11:55:51 AM
toplessnerd said:
I really do like the new design Rob, but like many others, the colors are too bright. Maybe switch them to darker colors or have different color schemes available when we get logins? (The logins are a great idea too, and it'd be cool if we could 'favorite' articles and such...)
Posted 11/15/2009 at 12:59:29 PM
Teev said:
Mostly the new design seems fine (I never really like change but I get used to it). but there's something about the typeface that's bugging me. I don't think it's the font - more like all the white space, like the letters are farther apart than they need to be, and the lines look double-spaced. But whatever, change the look all you want, just don't change the content, because I love the site just as it is.
Posted 11/15/2009 at 04:42:35 PM
AGuyWhoCares said:
whats the picture attached to this article from? Surrogates? Sarah Conner Chronicles? Its bugging the hell outta me.
Posted 11/15/2009 at 09:07:34 PM
pokefreaks said:
Good Luck! This is awesome, I'd been a reader of this site for over a year. :D
Posted 11/16/2009 at 12:16:47 AM
Ben said:
Is there any chance you can make the site use 100% of the user's window width? I've got huge borders on either side of the browser's window with nothing in them? What is it with web site designers and wanting to keep everything in a narrow strip down the middle? This resdesign would have been a perfect opportunity to get away from that.
Otherwise, nice and clean, if a little too bright.
Posted 11/16/2009 at 05:51:46 AM
ACWraith said:
I like the robot and the new functionality, but here's yet another vote for the site being too bright. I make a point of disabling my ad blocking software on sites I read regularly. Unfortunately, I'm currently using a Stylish theme that happens to cut out the ads just because it doesn't burn my eyes. (And, apparently, because I'd rather form rants about alleged freeloading than write my own frelling style. Bad, self! Bad!)
Posted 11/16/2009 at 05:56:36 AM
kjo1969 said:
As the designer of the original C3P-ette, I would like to say thanks to those of you who miss her. I preferred her sexier look over the current one who could maim you with a nipple.
Posted 11/16/2009 at 11:22:24 AM
RobP said:
I like the layout quite a bit, but, like so many otheres here, a darker color scheme would loook better. Not everything has to look like an Apple store. I also have to say I prefer the original Topless Robot robot, she looked ready to party. This one, even if it's the same one you use for the t-shirts, looks like she's only ready for one thing: Destroying All Humans.
Regardless, keep up the great work!
Oh, and one more thing: The title of each blog post doesn't show up above their appropriate entry. In fact, on the main page, only one blog title is visible-- the latest-- and it's at the very bottom of the screen. Same with this entry: the title is at the very bottom (directly below the "Post" button of this comment, actually). Maybe it's just my office computer settings?
Posted 11/16/2009 at 12:03:04 PM
Xanthippas said:
As long as the robots always have nipples, Topless Robot will always be my favorite blog.
Posted 11/16/2009 at 01:06:03 PM
toryoom said:
While I like the freshness of the new design, I gotta say it kinda looks waaaay to 'template blog' to me. This is probably due primarily to the kind of --how can I put it?-- "default font" look the text headers have, and also the sterile gray/white/faint blue color combination. ...Though I agree about the old site looking rather dated, I think the *idea* of some solid colors framing the whole thing the way the old site had gave it all a visual anchor, if you will, that prevented it from looking --at a glance-- like every other blog site out there. ...Might be something to look into for design tweaking.
Posted 11/16/2009 at 01:15:08 PM
Trekkie of the Rings said:
uhm...I would love to remove that TR logo from that poster. Where is that from anyway?
Posted 11/22/2009 at 07:11:15 PM






