I read "it's due out in fall." My mind saw "it's due out in fail." Damn internetz!!

what ever happened to the good'ol days of a control that all is required is finger strength?

LMAO

I like playstation so I feel bad about feeling this way but...I hope this thing dies a very quick and painful death at retail and that no game I'm actually interested in will require me to buy one.

huh... Engadget tested it in game and said they felt it was sluggish and always lagging behind your actions... unlike the Wiimote.

They didn't know if that was a problem with the technology or just pre-release software.

Rob, every time a good Wii game came out you claimed that you were too bored with the Wii to check it out. That's hardly Nintendo's fault.

I'm loosing my mind over playing SOCOM 4 (and possibly MAG) with this.

Because I loved the shit out of this control scheme with RE:4 on Wii, and since I heard about this move controller last year I have been waiting to buy RE:5 since it was the first game along with LBP to announce support for the feature.

By the fall if it's not needing a new version of RE:5, I should be able to pick it up on the cheap by then.

The augmented reality party games look fun though, the falling chicken game seemed to be a great example of how accurate it is. Turn the fan sideways and it acts like a saw and flings the chicken towards the screen, etc.

My only gripe is with the classic button's new layout. Huge mistake and hopefully one that will be corrected. Either return to a diamond layout, or rotate counter clockwise so triangle is top left and more natural fit for longtime players.

IGN also said it had a lag problem, and that the lag was even more noticeable in first person shooter demos.

Wow, they could have at least tried to make it look NOT like the Wii remote.

"Sony's not have the game developer Nintendo is."

Usually I can understand your typo's Rob. But this one eludes me.

I only have a Wii, however I don't play too many games so the 5-7 good games that come out a year on wii are good enough with me.

So now we just need Project Natal to fail and this dipshit motion control trend will be dead for good.

I'm somewhat biased, because unless it's Mario Kart then I suck at using the Wii control, but I've had enough of this motion control crap. Apparently my beloved Xbox is going to start using it as well? Why? It's a lot less popular than people seem to think and it'll probably only end in failure and a lot of wasted time and money. Screw motion control. Or at least if you must use it, bring back the POWER GLOVE!

EPIC MICKEY

EPIC MICKEY

EPIC MICKEY

Why do gamers hate change so much?
If this sucks and becomes like the power glove in future days, who cares? No real loss. But if game developers keep screwing around with this kind of technology, maybe years down the road they'll get it right and it will have become the building blocks for something awesome. I want my fully functional 'net suits dammit!

Well, it doesn't look as bad as it did when it showed up at E3, but... pass.

I'll leave it to Nintendo to create good games out of this idea. Sony and Microsoft just won't be able to due to a lack of out-of-the-box thinking, and I'm not going to spring for this just to play Tiger with motion controls in HD. It looks good enough on the Wii already.

Plus, were they testing this against the regular Wii or WiiMotion Plus? It's a HUGE difference.

Basically, not worth the extra hundred bucks - and that's just for single player.

Don't these people at Sony realize that even if they duplicate the Wii's waggle gimmick in an attempt to match its sales consumers will still choose the Wii because it costs, like, half as much?

I own a Wii and HATE it!!!!! I bought it because I thought Samba Di Amigo and NHL hockey would be great to play interactively. Boy was I surprised at just how shitty the games are for this system. Samba was awesome on the Dreamcast as well NHL2K2. The Wii version of these games are harder than hell to play and the damn sensor bar blows squirrel nuts. I own about 20 games and basically pissed my money away game after game. I finally gave up and gave the whole damn thing to my wife for the Wii Fit. Shit, the kids don't even want to play the system!

Although I love my Wii can I just say, let's please dispense with this bullshit and go right to in-home VR or holodecks or something? Seriously people it's 20freakin10. I want my holodeck!

Mario Galaxy was a great game, but how can you say it was one that didn't have a motion control gimmick thrown in? The only thing that "needed" the Wiimote was collecting Star Bits (the spin attack could have been assigned to a button), but they could have made the game without that gimmick and nothing of value would have been lost.

Mario Galaxy is a TEXTBOOK example of a game that doesn't need motion control but has it anyway because it's on the Wii.

http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/recommended-wii-games-2010-lin/866081

I don't care who you are their is going to be a few games on this list you would like.

I remember back when Sony announced Six-axis motion for the PS3, and alot of people cried foul at copying Nintendo. This "Move" thing makes that look silly.

I'd have to agree, this and Natal seems like a cheap way to break into Wii's casual territory which has allowed it to dominate sales this generation.

It looks like a small version of a buzzing device used in Japanese AVs.

It's the big...bulbous thing on top I'm concerned about...

I still prefer Wii because it is cheaper.

I stopped playing the Wii because I felt that I didn't feel like as giant a douche as I should, waving around the remote and nunchucks making bow and arrow miming motions. Somehow it wasn't lame enough.

But now I see what was missing. A big ole glowing colored ball on the end. That's should up the ante to Sopping Wet Douchebag status while using it. Bravo, Sony!

I didn't buy a Wii because I didn't give a crap about motion controllers. I've been a fan of those normal everyday controllers that have been around since the early days of console gaming and I don't see that changing just because my favorite console now carries it.

Hey! The Wii doesn't look like a game cube. How dare you compare the Wii to an old outdated system! How dare you, sir!

We all know the Wii is actually TWO Gamecubes taped together.

As far as the Wii front goes, I'm still looking forward to Red Steel 2. I think it may be something disenchanted Wii owners may want to keep an eye on before writing off motion controls entirely.

I thought the wii was neat I have some games I play fairly regularly and was about to pick up the motion board for wii fit till I found out my tubby nerd ass can't stand on it due to weighÞ restrictions! I have Þo lose weight to play a video game that will help me lose weight?!?!
This and project natal are retarded throw the money at a new dynamic like game engines or something

I don't want to be there when an angry Playstation fan whacks that thing against the wall and the colourful ball breaks off.

Also you have apparently have to buy two of them for one person to play anything like boxing/archery/etc. (as per the demo vid) since the sub controller doesn't have a motion sensor and is apparently of no use during these things. Sigh.

I must admit, there is something appealing to me about a motion control God of War game...

I saw the footage on G4 and it showed gladiator fights and street fighting and I thought to myself, "hmmm, I started working out, so that would be up my alley."

It's Wii Fit for Dudes. So I might get it.

Look, I understand that if you bought a Wii or an Xbox, you're going to be loyal to that system. This site and it's sister site Joystick Division is clearly pro XBox.

Forget all that. The PS3 is the best blu-ray player on the market. That alone makes it worth the $300 price. Then consider built in wi-fi, free online serivce, and a hard drive. Plus, you can play Uncharted 2, Killzone, Resistance, Heavy Rain, Little Big Planet, and God of War III. Oh, and did I mention that it's 3D capable.

If you own a Wii or an XBox, you should still get a PS3.